Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
Where this category sits in our topic hierarchy
Data Subject Rights & Notice (132 opinions)
Data subjects
-
Advisory Opinion 95-031 95-031When an individual supplies private data about her/himself to a government entity and one of the entity's employees disseminates that data to another employee whose work assignment does not reasonably require access to …
-
Advisory Opinion 95-028 95-028Is a
-
Advisory Opinion 95-026 95-026Is a parent of one of the students involved in the incident entitled to a copy of the sexual harassment report? If so, must any portions of the document be redacted? If so, which specific portions?
-
Advisory Opinion 95-020 95-020Did the University of Minnesota Program in Human Sexuality release private data it maintained about X without his consent, and if so, was that release authorized by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, or other applicable law?
-
Advisory Opinion 95-010 95-010Is X entitled to gain access to data maintained about him by the Olmsted County Community Services Department?
-
Advisory Opinion 95-008 95-008When an employee, or former employee, or an agent, or former agent, of an entity subject to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 possesses work-related data outside of the workplace, are those data government data as defined i…
-
Advisory Opinion 95-007 95-007Does Bemidji State University have the authority to require faculty members to provide their Social Security numbers and birth dates for the purposes of student registration, or is this a violation of Minnesota Statutes…
-
Advisory Opinion 94-055 94-055As the parent of the five minor children, does the mother have the legal right to the files in Crow Wing County Child Protection? Does the mother have the rights to see any data regarding the father, exclusive of the na…
-
Advisory Opinion 94-053 94-053Whether he has the right to gain access to data that has been blanked out by his probation officer.
-
Advisory Opinion 94-052 94-052Is X entitled to gain access to data maintained by Beltrami County Social Services concerning the welfare of her minor child, including but not limited to data maintained by child protection? In failing to respond to Ms…
-
Advisory Opinion 94-044 94-044By not supplying the custodial parent with the Activity Tracker Record that was supplied to Dr. DeSanctis (the psychologist) which was requested on 6 June 94 and the authorization for release of information which was re…
-
Advisory Opinion 94-041 94-041When Buffalo High School Psychologist, Paula Dietz, and Assistant Principal, Mary Loberg, coerced the minor child into believing that in order to be readmitted to school, a psychological evaluation would been to be cond…
-
Advisory Opinion 94-040 94-040When an employee of the City of Buffalo didn't know what the classification of a piece of private data was, did that constitute a violation of the minor child's rights by impeding access to government data and not apply…
-
Advisory Opinion 94-039 94-039When the Wright County Attorney's Office issued the petition on May 18, 1994, which included the Buffalo Police Report and not the custodial parent's Minnesota Data Practices Act Request of May 6, 1994, did that office …
-
Advisory Opinion 94-024 94-024Is the Program in Human Sexuality improperly denying X access to data maintained about him?
-
Advisory Opinion 94-017 94-017Whether your office is required by Minnesota Statutes Sections 13.03 and 13.04 to provide her with access to data concerning the County's collection and payment of child support to her?
-
Advisory Opinion 94-012 94-012As to the non-government providers and facilities which have to supply data on individual patients pursuant to the rules, is any relationship created which would require them to give the Tennessen Warning? In light of c…
-
Advisory Opinion 94-007 94-007Are data about the births of children public data in a public hospital? In his response, Mr. Melchert makes it clear that Ridgeview's position on the release of birth data is not a function of an interpretation of the 1…
-
Advisory Opinion 94-003 94-003Did the police department violate Minnesota Statute Section 13.04, Subdivision 3 by refusing to provide Y all of the records regarding X within the five day timeline, which began to run on October 9, 1992? Was the polic…
-
Advisory Opinion 94-002 94-002Did ISD 829 or its attorney(s) violate the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, Subd. 3 by denying X's parent his full educational records within the timelines required by law? Did ISD 829 violate the provisi…
-
Advisory Opinion 94-001 94-001Did ISD 829 violate the rights of Mr. Hay by denying him immediate access to the school records of the children without, in any way, on the date when he requested the records, stating any reason for the denial. Minnesot…
-
Advisory Opinion 93-009 93-009In your view, was it a responsibility of the Minnesota Department of Education to review compliance with Chapter 13, as well as compliance with FERPA? Did the Minnesota Department of Education violate the law by failing…
-
Advisory Opinion 93-007 93-007Did the Minnesota Department of Education violate the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act by failing to provide the contents of a closed investigative file within the timelines required by the Act? (Minn. Stat. Sec.…
-
Advisory Opinion 93-005 93-005Do the actions of either District, in failing to ensure that parents received a copy of the records within the timelines of Chapter 13, constitute a violation of that law, including a failure to explain access procedure…
-
Advisory Opinion 93-004 93-004Did the school district violate Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, Subd. 3 by failing to provide a copy of the statement to X's parents after their verbal and written requests for same? Does the state Department of Admin…