Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
Where this category sits in our topic hierarchy
Educational Data (173 opinions)
Educational data
Narrow down within “Data Subject Rights & Notice”
-
Advisory Opinion 02-015 02-015Does School District 1, Minneapolis, have an obligation to provide teaching staff with the Tennessen warning notice detailed in Minnesota Statutes, section 13.04, subdivision 2, concerning the collection and use of teac…
-
Advisory Opinion 02-006 02-006Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Independent School District 728, Elk River, respond appropriately to a request for access to the following data: surveys entitled
-
Advisory Opinion 02-002 02-002Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Metropolitan Council improperly disclose data about an employee?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-081 01-081Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may Independent School District 194, Lakeville, provide to the Lakeville Police Department, in connection with a report of a possible crime, the following data, without consen…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-041 01-041Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Independent School District 281, Robbinsdale, respond appropriately to a data subject's request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-040 01-040If the City of Woodbury requires an individual to supply his/her Social Security number as part of applying for a firearm permit, has the City violated that individual's rights under state and federal law?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-035 01-035Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Isanti County violate X's rights concerning a consent to release information that X was asked to provide the County?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-021 01-021Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 11, Anoka-Hennepin, inappropriately disseminate private educational data?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-016 01-016Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 625, St. Paul, respond appropriately to X's September 20, 2000, request to gain access to a
-
Advisory Opinion 00-073 00-073Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Goodhue County respond appropriately to a September 7 (or 8), 1999, request by X for data about X and X's child?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-012 00-012Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 272, Eden Prairie, respond appropriately to a parent's request for data about his child?
-
Advisory Opinion 00-004 00-004Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of the data in the following document: the Office of Crime Victims Ombudsman Critical Report #9900029? To the extent that any of the data in the Rep…
-
Advisory Opinion 99-010 99-010Were the Js' rights under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, violated when Carlton County disseminated a June 9, 1998, document pursuant to consent to release forms dated May 28, 1998?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-004 99-004Have A's rights under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, been violated if the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice collected data from A about A and did not supply him/her with a Tennessen Warning notice?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-043 98-043Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, what is the classification of the data contained in a complaint against a City of New Market employee?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-042 98-042Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 and Section 181.932, would the rights of certain Koch Refining Company employees be violated if the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency released, to the public, data contained in…Civil investigative data Data subjects Educational data Statutory construction (Ch. 645) Tennessen warning Tennessen warning #Absurd or unreasonable result (645.17) #Individual vs. person (13.02, subd. 4, 5 and 10) #Law enforcement agencies exempt #Limitation on collection/use of data (13.05, subd. 4) #Pollution Control Agency
-
Advisory Opinion 98-007 98-007Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 13.04 (subdivision 2), 13.05, 13.43, and 13.49, have the rights of the data subjects been violated because the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission did not provide a Tennessen…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-003 98-003Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 2, were M's rights violated when the Minnesota Department of Public Safety collected private data about M and 1) did not provide him/her with a complete
-
Advisory Opinion 98-001 98-001Did the District comply with Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 2, when it collected private data from H about H upon his/her being hired in 1991? Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, in 1994, did th…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-043 97-043Did Wadena County comply with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 2, when, as part of an evaluation, it collected information about the data subject?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-032 97-032Has School District #273, Edina, failed to comply with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 2, because it did not provide a Tennessen Warning notice to H and H's parents upon collection of d…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-020 97-020Has Special School District No. 1, Minneapolis, responded appropriately, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, to Ms. Morrison's request for access to the private data about her child? Has Special School District N…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-015 97-015Were the data collected by Dr. Seymour Gross, a Hennepin County employee, from
-
Advisory Opinion 96-063 96-063Is L entitled to gain access to the medical records of L's two minor children that are maintained by Southwest Family Services?
-
Advisory Opinion 96-062 96-062Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 2, was J entitled to receive a