Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
Where this category sits in our topic hierarchy
Law Enforcement & Investigations (122 opinions)
Law enforcement data
-
Advisory Opinion 07-013 07-013Did the City of Thief River Falls comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, when it did not release the make, year, and model of vehicles involved in traffic accidents?
-
Advisory Opinion 07-012 07-012Did the Ramsey County Sheriff comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, regarding a February 15, 2007, request for data (all data listed under #2 of the data request)? Did the Ramsey County Sheriff comply with Minneso…
-
Advisory Opinion 07-003 07-003Did the Douglas County Sheriff's Office comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in refusing to provide certain data contained in traffic accident reports?
-
Advisory Opinion 06-022 06-022Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, how are active warrants classified that are maintained by the City of Moorhead?
-
Advisory Opinion 05-031 05-031Did the City of Moorhead comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in denying access to a request for a transcript of a 911 call?
-
Advisory Opinion 05-028 05-028Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of the following data that the Nicollet County Attorney's office maintains: psychiatric records and data relating to psychiatric records about an al…
-
Advisory Opinion 04-069 04-069Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of active criminal investigative data under section 13.82, subdivision 7, to which the requestor, a member of the public, previously was granted acc…
-
Advisory Opinion 04-045 04-045Did the Winona County Attorney's Office comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in its determination regarding a November 24, 2003, request for access to data by a crime victim?
-
Advisory Opinion 04-033 04-033Did the City of Minneapolis comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in responding to a February 13, 2004, request for access to and inspection of the Friday, February 6, 2004, Minneapolis Police Department police re…
-
Advisory Opinion 04-031 04-031Is the Ramsey County Sheriff's Office in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, by refusing to allow the Shoreview Press to review the forms or documents on which public response or incident data are recorded?
-
Advisory Opinion 04-028 04-028Has the City of Minneapolis complied with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in its determination regarding a January 20, 2004, request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 03-042 03-042Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Koochiching County Sheriff respond appropriately to a request for the name of an alleged victim of a certain incident under investigation?
-
Advisory Opinion 03-022 03-022If a law enforcement agency responds to a request by the public for law enforcement services or takes action on its own initiative, and the request or action relates to a property-damage-only accident where the apparent…
-
Advisory Opinion 03-021 03-021What is the classification of the following data that the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources maintains: a list of each Conservation Officer's annual citation numbers for the past two years?
-
Advisory Opinion 03-015 03-015Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Department of Public Safety respond appropriately to a request for a copy of a videotape of a March 28, 2002, pursuit which resulted in an arrest?
-
Advisory Opinion 02-050 02-050If the Minnesota Department of Public Safety waived attorney-client privilege as to the legal memorandum from the Attorney General's Office, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, would the memorandum, in whole or …
-
Advisory Opinion 02-040 02-040Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of Bird Island respond appropriately to a request for government data?
-
Advisory Opinion 02-010 02-010Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, and Minnesota Statutes, section 299C.11, did the Minnesota Department of Public Safety respond appropriately to an August 9, 2000, request that certain data be returned to the…
-
Advisory Opinion 02-009 02-009Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, and Minnesota Statutes, section 299C.11, did Crow Wing County respond appropriately to an August 9, 2000, request that certain data be returned to the data subject X? Pursuant…
-
Advisory Opinion 02-008 02-008Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, and Minnesota Statutes, section 299C.11, did the City of Brainerd respond appropriately to an August 9, 2000, request that certain data be returned to the data subject X? Purs…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-079 01-079When a government entity uses Minnesota Statutes, section 13.393, as the basis for denying access to public documents sought pursuant to a data practices request, must the government entity also give the underlying basi…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-070 01-070Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of the following data that the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources maintains: all identifying data about Minnesota State Conservation Officers…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-069 01-069What is the classification of previous and current reports about X that the Le Sueur County Sheriff maintains? X requested and signed a
-
Advisory Opinion 01-064 01-064Would the public's right to gain access to government data that describe actions taken by employees of the City of Minneapolis be frustrated if the City did not document these activities?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-050 01-050Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of St. Paul Police Department respond appropriately to a March 22, 2001, request for data by denying KSTP-TV access to the identity of the complainant and the tra…