Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
Where this category sits in our topic hierarchy
Requesting & Accessing Data (391 opinions)
Response to data requests
Narrow down within “Requesting & Accessing Data”
Response to data requests (202)
Copy costs (103)
Requests for data (88)
Inspection (49)
Existence of data (27)
Redaction (20)
Multiple data subjects (19)
Summary data (12)
Standing requests (3)
-
Advisory Opinion 99-026 99-026Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of Duluth Housing and Redevelopment Authority respond properly to a request for public access to the so-called
-
Advisory Opinion 99-023 99-023Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources respond appropriately to a request for access to muskellunge data contained in public reports and surveys?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-021 99-021Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, has the Metropolitan Airports Commissioner responded appropriately to a data subject's request for access to data about him/her?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-005 99-005Did Douglas County respond properly to a request for access to public data regarding a County employee's termination?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-001 99-001Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the City of St. Paul violate the data requestor's rights by denying him access to the following data: data regarding the MediaOne plan to move into the office that was form…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-053 98-053Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Central Minnesota Mental Health Center respond appropriately to an October 1, 1998, request by a data subject?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-051 98-051Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, did Hennepin County respond in a timely manner to a request for access to data on August 30, 1996?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-047 98-047Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, has the University of Minnesota responded in a timely manner to a June 17, 1998, for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-044 98-044Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency respond in a timely fashion to a request by the Star Tribune for access to data? Did the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency violate t…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-037 98-037Pursuant to Minnesota Statues Chapter 13, is the City of Wanamingo's charge for copies of public data allowable: $.25 per page plus the cost of the time involved to retrieve, compile and copy documents?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-031 98-031Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, has the Office of the Ombudsman for Mental Health and Mental Retardation responded properly to a January 16, 1998 (later clarified in a letter dated March 31, 1998), request fo…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-028 98-028Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, has the St. Cloud Housing and Redevelopment Authority responded appropriately to a request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-011 98-011Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, has Benton County responded appropriately to a request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-010 98-010Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, has Benton County responded appropriately to a request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-005 98-005Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Department of Commerce respond appropriately to a request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-053 97-053Has the Minnesota Department of Human Rights responded properly, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, to a data subject's request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-052 97-052Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, has the Minnesota Department of Finance responded appropriately to a request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-047 97-047Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.46, has the Anoka County Metro Regional Treatment Center responded appropriately to a request for access to data by the data subject?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-044 97-044Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 3, has Mower County responded properly to a July 23, 1997, request for access to data about the deceased data subject?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-041 97-041Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, subdivision 3, has the University of Minnesota responded to the following request for government data made in a letter dated May 27, 1997: all existing data pertaining to th…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-035 97-035Has the University of Minnesota responded properly, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, to a request for the following data: Copies of itemized receipts for the
-
Advisory Opinion 97-031 97-031Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, has the City of Roseville responded properly to the following requests for access to government data:
-
Advisory Opinion 97-025 97-025Has the University of Minnesota responded appropriately, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, to Mr. Lamphere's December 23, 1996, request for access to data? Has the University of Minnesota responded appropriatel…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-020 97-020Has Special School District No. 1, Minneapolis, responded appropriately, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, to Ms. Morrison's request for access to the private data about her child? Has Special School District N…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-002 97-002Does Mr. Haatvedt have the right, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, to gain access to the