Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
Narrow down within “Requesting & Accessing Data”
-
Advisory Opinion 98-036 98-036Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, did the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board fully comply with a February 26, 1998, request for access to data, and was the response timely?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-031 98-031Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, has the Office of the Ombudsman for Mental Health and Mental Retardation responded properly to a January 16, 1998 (later clarified in a letter dated March 31, 1998), request fo…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-030 98-030Does a per page photocopying fee of $0.60 quoted by St. Louis County violate K's rights, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04 and Minnesota Rules Sections 9500.2740, subpart 11, and 9500.0130, subpart 4?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-028 98-028Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, has the St. Cloud Housing and Redevelopment Authority responded appropriately to a request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-025 98-025Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, were C's rights violated if School District 709, Duluth, did not provide a timely response to data requested by C in his/her February 11, 1997, letter? Pursuant to Minnesota…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-022 98-022Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did Independent School District 197 respond appropriately to a data subject's verbal and written requests for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-020 98-020Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, may ISD #196 release, as public data, multiple sets of summary data regarding students with common student identifiers that would allow for correlation or cross-referencing of …
-
Advisory Opinion 98-019 98-019Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did ISD #196 respond appropriately to a January 20, 1998, request for access to the following data:
-
Advisory Opinion 98-012 98-012Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, did the University of Minnesota respond properly, i.e., did the University provide a timely response, to a request for access to data dated November 25, 1997?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-011 98-011Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, has Benton County responded appropriately to a request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-010 98-010Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, has Benton County responded appropriately to a request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-009 98-009Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 3, did the University of Minnesota respond properly, i.e., did the University provide a timely response, to a request for access to data dated October 6, 1997?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-005 98-005Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Department of Commerce respond appropriately to a request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-055 97-055Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 13.03 and 13.43, has the University of Minnesota responded properly to an October 13, 1997, request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-053 97-053Has the Minnesota Department of Human Rights responded properly, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, to a data subject's request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-052 97-052Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, has the Minnesota Department of Finance responded appropriately to a request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-047 97-047Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.46, has the Anoka County Metro Regional Treatment Center responded appropriately to a request for access to data by the data subject?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-046 97-046Has the City of St. Paul complied with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, subdivision 3, in charging $1,020.60 for copies of public data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-044 97-044Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 3, has Mower County responded properly to a July 23, 1997, request for access to data about the deceased data subject?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-042 97-042Did Hennepin County Medical Center comply with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 3, in charging a data subject's representative $19.08 for copies of the data subject's medical data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-041 97-041Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, subdivision 3, has the University of Minnesota responded to the following request for government data made in a letter dated May 27, 1997: all existing data pertaining to th…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-040 97-040Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, subdivision 3, has the University of Minnesota responded properly to requests for access to government data made by Tom Lamphere on June 19, 1997, and June 24, 1997?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-038 97-038Has the City of Lakeville Police Department complied with Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 3, in charging a data subject $6.50 ($5 for the first page and $.50 for each additional page) for copies of data co…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-035 97-035Has the University of Minnesota responded properly, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, to a request for the following data: Copies of itemized receipts for the
-
Advisory Opinion 97-031 97-031Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, has the City of Roseville responded properly to the following requests for access to government data: