Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
-
Advisory Opinion 01-046 01-046Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Independent School District 11, Anoka-Hennepin, respond appropriately to a request for photocopies of private data by including in the copy costs a charge for
-
Advisory Opinion 01-045 01-045Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in response to a request for copies of public personnel data, may Independent School District 11, Anoka-Hennepin, require a person to pay for photocopies of a blank applicatio…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-044 01-044Has the Lake Superior Center (Great Lakes Aquarium) responded appropriately to a request for access to public government data by stating that it is not subject to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-043 01-043What is the classification of the following data that Jackson County maintains: data about County employees who recently became Court employees as the result of recently passed legislation?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-042 01-042Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, has Special School District 1, Minneapolis, responded appropriately to a December 12, 2000, request for the following information relating to the Effie MacGreagor Memorial/Mur…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-041 01-041Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Independent School District 281, Robbinsdale, respond appropriately to a data subject's request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-040 01-040If the City of Woodbury requires an individual to supply his/her Social Security number as part of applying for a firearm permit, has the City violated that individual's rights under state and federal law?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-039 01-039Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of Cottage Grove respond appropriately to a request for access to secret ballots that were intended but not used for the purpose of selecting finalists to fill a …
-
Advisory Opinion 01-038 01-038Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Murray County Central Schools respond appropriately to an April 12, 2000, request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-037 01-037Did School District 239, Rushford-Peterson, violate Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, when it released data to parents that their complaint about a District employee had been substantiated?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-036 01-036Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Le Sueur County Sheriff respond appropriately to a request in December 1999 for
-
Advisory Opinion 01-035 01-035Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did Isanti County violate X's rights concerning a consent to release information that X was asked to provide the County?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-034 01-034Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, is School District 273, Edina, required to provide access to public data about all past and present District employees, in response to a December 28, 2000, request?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-033 01-033Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, does $50.00 per hour for
-
Advisory Opinion 01-032 01-032Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, is the Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAPP) a government entity subject to Chapter 13 regulation? Did MAPP respond appropriately to a request for access to data related to the…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-031 01-031Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, are the following Minnesota State agencies required to provide access to public data about all past and present employees in response to an individual's requests, under circum…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-030 01-030Are the Minnesota Department of Public Safety's - specifically the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension's - charges of 1) $250 for a copy of the criminal history database and 2) $15 for a copy of a background check, allowabl…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-029 01-029Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of
-
Advisory Opinion 01-028 01-028Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did School District 281, Robbinsdale, appropriately withhold from X data on interview notes that identify the persons who interviewed X for employment?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-027 01-027Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.03, did Special School District 1, Minneapolis, respond appropriately to a request for access to public data? Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.03, did Special School …
-
Advisory Opinion 01-026 01-026Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.03, did the Minnesota Department of Human Services respond appropriately to a request for access to data made on November 15, 2000? Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.0…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-025 01-025Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Department of Children, Families and Learning respond appropriately to two requests for access to scholarship application scoring data, dated May 30, 2000, a…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-024 01-024Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.03, did the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry respond appropriately to a request for public access to data made on November 15, 2000? Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, s…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-023 01-023Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.03, did the Minnesota Department of Public Safety respond appropriately to a request for access to data made on November 15, 2000?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-022 01-022Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of the following data that the City of Maplewood maintains: data in a letter regarding a former city employee?