Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
-
Advisory Opinion 99-023 99-023Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources respond appropriately to a request for access to muskellunge data contained in public reports and surveys?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-022 99-022Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, and Minnesota Statutes, section 375.86, did Hennepin County respond appropriately to the Star Tribune's request for access to a copy of a computer program?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-021 99-021Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, has the Metropolitan Airports Commissioner responded appropriately to a data subject's request for access to data about him/her?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-020 99-020Have Mr. Plisner's rights under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, been violated if the City of Little Canada requires him to inspect public government data in the presence of a City employee?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-019 99-019Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, may the Waterville Police Civil Service Commission disseminate private personnel data about an employee under its jurisdiction to the Waterville City Council?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-018 99-018Did Independent School District 15, St. Francis, properly respond to a public request for information regarding its evaluation of the performance of a District employee?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-017 99-017Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, may the St. Cloud State University Human Resources Office impose the fees indicated on its
-
Advisory Opinion 99-016 99-016Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities (MnSCU) appropriately deny access to data based on section 13.39, civil investigative data?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-015 99-015Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did School District 273, Edina, or its agents inappropriately disseminate private educational data about student Y and/or Y's parents to the public which then appeared in a new…
-
Advisory Opinion 99-014 99-014Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, what is the classification of the following data generated by the Arrowhead Library System in response to a complaint made about one of its employees: an investigative report a…
-
Advisory Opinion 99-013 99-013Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor properly deny public access to individual legislator's survey responses?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-012 99-012Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Health Professionals Service Program respond properly to a data subject's request for access to data? Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Min…
-
Advisory Opinion 99-011 99-011Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of St. Paul respond properly to an employee's request for access to data consisting of the results of her/his oral examination for promotion?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-010 99-010Were the Js' rights under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, violated when Carlton County disseminated a June 9, 1998, document pursuant to consent to release forms dated May 28, 1998?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-009 99-009Are the following data maintained by the Minnesota Department of Revenue classified as not public trade secret pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.37, or any other law: certain data related to a filing under Minn…
-
Advisory Opinion 99-008 99-008Were the data subject's rights, under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, violated when the Minnesota Department of Human Services denied access, citing section 13.39, to data s/he requested on November 17, 1998.
-
Advisory Opinion 99-007 99-007Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did Carlton County respond appropriately to a September 9, 1998, request for access to data by the data subjects?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-006 99-006Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry respond appropriately to a December 4, 1998, request for access to certain workers' compensation data?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-005 99-005Did Douglas County respond properly to a request for access to public data regarding a County employee's termination?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-004 99-004Have A's rights under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, been violated if the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice collected data from A about A and did not supply him/her with a Tennessen Warning notice?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-003 99-003Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of the Richfield properly deny access to a tape recording of a closed city council meeting?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-002 99-002Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Freeborn County Department of Human Services respond appropriately to a data subject's request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 99-001 99-001Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the City of St. Paul violate the data requestor's rights by denying him access to the following data: data regarding the MediaOne plan to move into the office that was form…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-054 98-054Are the following data, maintained by the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, classified as trade secret pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.37: data contained in a proposed Power Purchase Agreement between Nor…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-053 98-053Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Central Minnesota Mental Health Center respond appropriately to an October 1, 1998, request by a data subject?