Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
-
Advisory Opinion 98-026 98-026What is the classification of the following data maintained by the Metropolitan 911 Board: data that
-
Advisory Opinion 98-025 98-025Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, were C's rights violated if School District 709, Duluth, did not provide a timely response to data requested by C in his/her February 11, 1997, letter? Pursuant to Minnesota…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-024 98-024Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.43, did School District 317, Deer River, respond appropriately to a request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-023 98-023What is the classification of the data contained in Exhibits A through E, which relate to an issue involving a City of Barnesville employee?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-022 98-022Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did Independent School District 197 respond appropriately to a data subject's verbal and written requests for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-021 98-021Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Minnesota State Board of Private Detective and Protective Agent Services respond appropriately to a request to inspect and obtain copies of government data?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-020 98-020Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, may ISD #196 release, as public data, multiple sets of summary data regarding students with common student identifiers that would allow for correlation or cross-referencing of …
-
Advisory Opinion 98-019 98-019Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did ISD #196 respond appropriately to a January 20, 1998, request for access to the following data:
-
Advisory Opinion 98-018 98-018Did the Minnesota Department of Economic Security violate M's rights by inappropriately disseminating private data about M?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-017 98-017Was an individual's right to gain access to public data, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, violated because the City of Eagan denied her access to the following data: appraisals prepared for the Oak Chase Addit…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-016 98-016An employee of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety was disciplined. The employee grieved the matter and it went to arbitration. Before the arbitrator rendered a decision, a settlement was reached in which the disc…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-015 98-015Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, what is the classification of data contained in two letters dated January 13, 1998?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-014 98-014Would it violate a data subject's rights for a county attorney to disseminate data obtained in juvenile court delinquency and petty offense proceedings to the law enforcement agency whose officer signed the delinquency …
-
Advisory Opinion 98-013 98-013What is the classification of the following data maintained by the Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State: private keys from key pairs used by state and other government employees to digitally sign electronic messag…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-012 98-012Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, did the University of Minnesota respond properly, i.e., did the University provide a timely response, to a request for access to data dated November 25, 1997?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-011 98-011Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, has Benton County responded appropriately to a request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-010 98-010Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, has Benton County responded appropriately to a request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-009 98-009Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 3, did the University of Minnesota respond properly, i.e., did the University provide a timely response, to a request for access to data dated October 6, 1997?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-008 98-008Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 3, did the University of Minnesota respond properly, i.e., did the University fully comply with the requests and were the responses timely, to requests for acces…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-007 98-007Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 13.04 (subdivision 2), 13.05, 13.43, and 13.49, have the rights of the data subjects been violated because the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission did not provide a Tennessen…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-006 98-006Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 3, did the University of Minnesota respond properly, i.e., did the University fully comply with the requests and were the responses timely, to requests for acces…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-005 98-005Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Minnesota Department of Commerce respond appropriately to a request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-004 98-004Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, what is the classification of the data contained in the Level II Sex Offender notification fact sheet? If a Level II Sex Offender notification fact sheet contains private data,…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-003 98-003Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 2, were M's rights violated when the Minnesota Department of Public Safety collected private data about M and 1) did not provide him/her with a complete
-
Advisory Opinion 98-002 98-002What is the classification of the data contained in the Clay County