Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
Narrow down within “Data Subject Rights & Notice”
-
Advisory Opinion 99-002 99-002Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the Freeborn County Department of Human Services respond appropriately to a data subject's request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-053 98-053Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did the Central Minnesota Mental Health Center respond appropriately to an October 1, 1998, request by a data subject?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-043 98-043Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, what is the classification of the data contained in a complaint against a City of New Market employee?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-042 98-042Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 and Section 181.932, would the rights of certain Koch Refining Company employees be violated if the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency released, to the public, data contained in…Civil investigative data Data subjects Educational data Statutory construction (Ch. 645) Tennessen warning Tennessen warning #Absurd or unreasonable result (645.17) #Individual vs. person (13.02, subd. 4, 5 and 10) #Law enforcement agencies exempt #Limitation on collection/use of data (13.05, subd. 4) #Pollution Control Agency
-
Advisory Opinion 98-018 98-018Did the Minnesota Department of Economic Security violate M's rights by inappropriately disseminating private data about M?
-
Advisory Opinion 98-007 98-007Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 13.04 (subdivision 2), 13.05, 13.43, and 13.49, have the rights of the data subjects been violated because the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission did not provide a Tennessen…
-
Advisory Opinion 98-003 98-003Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 2, were M's rights violated when the Minnesota Department of Public Safety collected private data about M and 1) did not provide him/her with a complete
-
Advisory Opinion 98-001 98-001Did the District comply with Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 2, when it collected private data from H about H upon his/her being hired in 1991? Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, in 1994, did th…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-053 97-053Has the Minnesota Department of Human Rights responded properly, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, to a data subject's request for access to data?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-047 97-047Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.46, has the Anoka County Metro Regional Treatment Center responded appropriately to a request for access to data by the data subject?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-043 97-043Did Wadena County comply with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 2, when, as part of an evaluation, it collected information about the data subject?
-
Advisory Opinion 97-032 97-032Has School District #273, Edina, failed to comply with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 2, because it did not provide a Tennessen Warning notice to H and H's parents upon collection of d…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-020 97-020Has Special School District No. 1, Minneapolis, responded appropriately, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, to Ms. Morrison's request for access to the private data about her child? Has Special School District N…
-
Advisory Opinion 97-015 97-015Were the data collected by Dr. Seymour Gross, a Hennepin County employee, from
-
Advisory Opinion 97-008 97-008Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 3, has the City of Minneapolis Police Department responded appropriately to J's request for access to data about J?
-
Advisory Opinion 96-063 96-063Is L entitled to gain access to the medical records of L's two minor children that are maintained by Southwest Family Services?
-
Advisory Opinion 96-062 96-062Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 2, was J entitled to receive a
-
Advisory Opinion 96-048 96-048Did District 721 violate Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 when a District employee disseminated data contained in a Rice County Suspected Child Abuse/Neglect Form about a student and his/her father to the student's mother?…
-
Advisory Opinion 96-047 96-047Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, must a government entity honor standing requests for data? Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.42, what is the classification of directory information on persons recently…
-
Advisory Opinion 96-042 96-042Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, did Dr. Willard Miller inappropriately gain access to private data about K, a University of Minnesota student? Did Dr. Willard Miller violate a provision of Minnesota Statutes …
-
Advisory Opinion 96-028 96-028Is it a violation of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 when an individual is required to inspect private government data in the presence of another individual who is not entitled to gain access to the private data being ins…
-
Advisory Opinion 96-027 96-027Has Nicollet County met its obligation, under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, to provide R, through R's attorney, access to its data about S, R's minor child?
-
Advisory Opinion 96-023 96-023Has School District #696, Ely, complied with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 3, regarding access to data by a data subject?
-
Advisory Opinion 96-018 96-018Can DHS deny K access to data maintained about K on the basis of the six-month limitation stated in Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, subdivision 3, when, according to K, a dispute or action is pending that involves the…
-
Advisory Opinion 96-016 96-016Upon a request for access to data by a data subject, does a government entity have authority, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, to require the data subject to provide the following data: date of request; studen…