Advisory Opinions Library
Search and research 1,071 opinions published by the Minnesota Department of Administration (1993–present). New to the legal archive? Try Exploring by topic.
Narrow down within “Open Meeting Law”
-
Advisory Opinion 06-012 06-012Did the members of the Brunswick Town Board comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13D, when they held a meeting outside the territorial limits of Brunswick Township on August 26, 2005? Did the members of the Brunswick…
-
Advisory Opinion 05-029 05-029Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of the following data the City of Kimball typically would include in the minutes of an open meeting: two resolutions regarding the discipline of two…
-
Advisory Opinion 05-027 05-027Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of the following data: audiotapes of two closed Saint Paul Board of Education meetings containing
-
Advisory Opinion 05-014 05-014Are the committees of the Cannon Falls Community Hospital Board in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13D, when they meet in closed session?
-
Advisory Opinion 05-013 05-013Pursuant to Chapter 13D, may the Wild Rice Watershed District close an open meeting to discuss its contract with an independent contractor?
-
Advisory Opinion 04-057 04-057Did the supervisors of Cannon Falls Township comply with Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.04, subdivision 2 (b) and (c) for special meetings held on July 8, 2002, July 31, 2002, September 16, 2002 and December 5, 2002? D…
-
Advisory Opinion 04-055 04-055Did Todd County comply with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in charging $16 for copying and faxing eleven pages of minutes from three County Board meetings?
-
Advisory Opinion 04-037 04-037Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, if the employee has not given his/her written consent to release data under 49 C.F.R. §382.405(h) and 49 C.F.R. §40.321, what is the classification of the data relating to the…
-
Advisory Opinion 04-018 04-018Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of the following data that School District 832, Mahtomedi, maintains: personal notes taken by a school board member during a school board meeting, w…
-
Advisory Opinion 04-004 04-004Pursuant to Chapter 13D, did Independent School District 276, Minnetonka, give proper notice that the ArtsCenter reorganization would be acted on at the September 11, 2003, special meeting of the board?
-
Advisory Opinion 04-001 04-001Is the Minnesota FAIR Plan Board subject to the requirements of the Open Meeting Law, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13D?
-
Advisory Opinion 03-020 03-020Where a public body closes a meeting in reliance on Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.05, subdivision 2(b), for
-
Advisory Opinion 03-007 03-007Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 13 and 13D, did Independent School District 146, Barnesville, respond appropriately to a request for the summary of its conclusions regarding the performance evaluation of the Di…
-
Advisory Opinion 02-035 02-035Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 and 13D, did Independent School District 146, Barnesville, respond appropriately to a request for the summary of its conclusions regarding the performance evaluation of the Dis…
-
Advisory Opinion 02-033 02-033Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13.04, was Independent School District 333, Ogilvie, required to provide a Tennessen Warning to X and Y when it asked them to submit a complaint in writing? Pursuant to Minnesota …
-
Advisory Opinion 02-021 02-021Did School District 299, Caledonia, properly respond to a public request for data regarding its evaluation of the performance of the District superintendent?
-
Advisory Opinion 02-013 02-013Is a school board member an
-
Advisory Opinion 02-003 02-003Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, in response to a November 14, 2001, data request, did the Ramsey County Library Board properly deny access to certain calendar/telephone register notes of the Library Director?
-
Advisory Opinion 01-072 01-072Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, how are the government data contained in the following documents classified: (1)
-
Advisory Opinion 01-058 01-058Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, and Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.01, did the City of Ellsworth provide appropriate access to the public to all written materials discussed at a December 13, 2000, public ta…
-
Advisory Opinion 01-039 01-039Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, did the City of Cottage Grove respond appropriately to a request for access to secret ballots that were intended but not used for the purpose of selecting finalists to fill a …
-
Advisory Opinion 00-001 00-001Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, and Minnesota Statutes, section 471.705, would it violate the rights of data subjects if the City of Tyler City Council discussed certain data relating to a housing rehabilita…
-
Advisory Opinion 00-037 00-037Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, and Minnesota Statutes, section 471.705, has Lake County responded appropriately to a March 20, 2000, request for the following data: copies of audiotape recordings of closed …
-
Advisory Opinion 00-020 00-020Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, what is the classification of the data contained in a student petition that criticizes the performance of a District employee? Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may …
-
Advisory Opinion 99-018 99-018Did Independent School District 15, St. Francis, properly respond to a public request for information regarding its evaluation of the performance of a District employee?