Advisory Opinion 96-036
August 8, 1996; Carver/Scott County
Background & Issues
After two individuals were placed on probation for animal cruelty, the local Humane Society conducted regular farm inspections to monitor their compliance and created detailed reports. The Humane Society initially provided copies of these reports to a member of the public but later stopped releasing them due to privacy concerns. The requester asked whether the Humane Society's inspection reports are public.
Commissioner Decision
The Commissioner concluded that information in the inspection reports showing the extent to which the probation conditions are being met is public data.
Automated synopsis generated for quick reference only — it has not been reviewed word-for-word against the official record and is not legal advice. Always review the full opinion text below for the Commissioner's actual determination, or see the original document on mn.gov. Think this summary misstates the opinion? Report it.
Excerpted Ruling / ConclusionBased on the correspondence in this matter, my opinion on the issue raised by Ms. Finamore is as follows:
Data in the Humane Society investigators' reports that document the extent to which the conditions of probation have been or are being met are public data, pursuant to Section 13.84, subdivision 6 (f).
August 8, 1996; Carver/Scott County
8/8/1996 10:14:43 AM
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to section 13.072 of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 - the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. It is based on the facts and information available to the Commissioner as described below.
Facts and Procedural History:For purposes of simplification, the information presented by the person who requested this opinion is presented in summary form. Copies of the complete submission are on file at the offices of PIPA and, with the exception of any data classified as not public, are available for public access.On June 10, 1996, PIPA received a letter requesting this opinion from Pamela J. Finamore. In that letter, Ms. Finamore asked about her rights to gain access to data created by the Carver/Scott Humane Society. Ms. Finamore's request required clarification with PIPA staff with regard to the issue the Commissioner would address in this opinion. In response to Ms. Finamore's request, PIPA, on behalf of the Commissioner, wrote to Marlys Palmer, President of the Board, Minnesota Federated Humane Societies (an umbrella organization of Minnesota humane societies). The purposes of this letter, dated June 21, 1996, were to inform Ms. Palmer of Ms. Finamore's request, and to ask her or the Humane Society's attorney to provide information or support for its position. PIPA did not receive a response from the Minnesota Federated Humane Societies. A summary of the detailed facts of this matter follows. According to information provided by Ms. Finamore, including copies of sentencing orders, two individuals in Scott County are on probation, having pled guilty to charges of cruelty to animals. One of the terms of their probation is that the Carver/Scott Humane Society must be allowed to make twice-monthly inspections of the individuals' premises. According to Ms. Finamore, the Humane Society investigators write reports of their findings, which may include photographs or videotape. The individuals were sentenced in February 1995. Ms. Finamore initially received copies of the investigators' reports. However, in May 1996, she was told that an advisor to the Minnesota Federated Humane Societies told the Carver Scott Humane Society's executive director and one of the humane investigators that [they] could be held liable for 'public disclosure of private data', because the Humane Society investigators had given copies of their reports to me and had been in contact with me.
Issue:
In her request for an opinion, Ms. Finamore asked the Commissioner to address the following issue:
Discussion:
Minnesota Statutes Section 13.84, subdivision 1, provides:
The Carver/Scott Humane Society is acting as an agent to perform other duties, i.e, to monitor the probationers' compliance with a condition of their probation. Therefore, the data in the reports of the Humane Society investigators are court services data.
Court services data may be classified as public, private or confidential. Section 13.84, subdivision 6, provides that the following court services data on adult individuals are public:
The reports of the Humane Society investigators are court services data, i.e., data which were created, collected, used or maintained by a probation authority, or by an agent designated by the court to perform studies or other duties. The data are described under Section 13.84, subdivision 6 (f), i.e., data which document the extent to which the conditions of probation have been or are being met. Therefore, pursuant to Section 13.84, subdivision 6, the reports are public, including photographs and videotapes, and Ms. Finamore is entitled to copies of them. Presumably those reports are filed with the Court, and should be available for public access there. (See Rules of Public Access to Records of the Judicial Branch.) However, regardless where the data are maintained, they are public data, and must be made accessible by the public. (For further discussion of this point, see Commissioner's Advisory Opinion 94-035.) Opinion:Based on the correspondence in this matter, my opinion on the issue raised by Ms. Finamore is as follows:
Signed:
Elaine S. Hansen
Dated: August 8, 1996
|