Advisory Opinion 97-054
December 31, 1997; Minnesota Department of Revenue
Background & Issues
The Minnesota Department of Revenue received a request for records concerning the Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company, but the railway company argued that the information was private. Because the Department believed the records were accessible to the public, it asked the Commissioner to determine the classification of the railway's property tax unit valuation details and county apportionment worksheet.
Commissioner Decision
The Commissioner decided that both the unit valuation details and the apportionment worksheet are public records.
Automated synopsis generated for quick reference only — it has not been reviewed word-for-word against the official record and is not legal advice. Always review the full opinion text below for the Commissioner's actual determination, or see the original document on mn.gov. Think this summary misstates the opinion? Report it.
Excerpted Ruling / ConclusionBased on the facts and information provided, my opinion on the issue raised by Mr. Girard is as follows:
The following data maintained by the Minnesota Department of Revenue are public data, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, subdivision 1: 1) the Department's unit valuation detail for the Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company (DMamp;IR) for property taxes payable in 1997 and 1998; and 2) the Department's Apportionment Worksheet for determining 1997 market values for the DMamp;IR for St. Louis County.
December 31, 1997; Minnesota Department of Revenue
12/31/1997 10:14:43 AM
This is an opinion of the Commissioner of Administration issued pursuant to section 13.072 of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 - the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. It is based on the facts and information available to the Commissioner as described below.
Facts and Procedural History:For purposes of simplification, the information presented by the person who requested this opinion and the response from the government entity with which the person disagrees are presented in summary form. Copies of the complete submissions are on file at the offices of PIPA and, with the exception of any data classified as not public, are available for public access.On November 12, 1997, PIPA received a letter from James L. Girard, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Revenue. In his letter, Mr. Girard requested that the Commissioner issue an opinion regarding the classification of certain data maintained by Revenue. Mr. Girard enclosed copies of related correspondence and other documents. A summary of the detailed facts of this matter follows. Revenue received a request for access to data it maintains on the Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company ( DMamp;IR. ) DMamp;IR believes that the data are classified as nonpublic, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 270B. Revenue believes the data are not classified according to that Chapter and, pursuant to Section 13.03, are public data.
Issue:
In his request for an opinion, Mr. Girard asked the Commissioner to address the following issue:
Discussion:
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13.03, subdivision 1, government data are public unless otherwise classified by state statute, temporary classification (see Section 13.06), or federal law.
DMamp;IR, in its correspondence with Revenue, contends that the data in question are nonpublic return information under Section 270B.01, subdivision 3. According to Commissioner Girard, [i]t is true that this type of information is normally return information, but it is collected by [Revenue] to enforce the tax laws found in [Minnesota Statutes Sections] 270.80 - 270.88. These laws are clearly not included in the definition of Minnesota tax laws' in [Section] 270B.01, subd 8, and therefore Chapter 270B does not apply to this case. Minnesota Statutes Chapter 270B classifies Revenue data for purposes of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and other statutes. Pursuant to Section 270B.01, subdivision 3, return information means certain data . . . received by, recorded by, prepared by, given to, or collected by the commissioner [of Revenue] with respect to the determination of the existence, possible existence, or amount of liability of any person under Minnesota tax laws. . . . (Emphasis added.)
Pursuant to Section 270B.01, subdivision 8:
According to Commissioner Girard, the data in question were collected by Revenue pursuant to the tax laws found in Sections 270.80-270.88. Those sections are not included in the Section 270B.01, subdivision 8, list of Minnesota tax laws for which Chapter 270B is applicable. Accordingly, the data in question are public, pursuant to Section 13.03, subdivision 1. Opinion:Based on the facts and information provided, my opinion on the issue raised by Mr. Girard is as follows:
Signed:
Elaine S. Hansen
Dated: December 31, 1997 |